IT Professional. Data nerd. Photography enthusiast. Wife and mother. Weight Watcher. Atheist. Owner of many flowerbeds.
342 stories
·
3 followers

Department of Justice Uses Search Warrant To Get Data On Visitors to Anti-Trump Site

1 Comment and 4 Shares

I used to have DreamHost as a webhost. We parted ways, but I always admired and appreciated that they reliably stood up for their customers — including me — in the face of bogus legal threats seeking to suppress speech.

This week they're standing up admirably for internet users once again, this time in the face of an overbroad and deeply concerning search warrant issued in connection with Inauguration Day protests. Their blog post about it is here.

Washington D.C. prosecutors have charged and prosecuted inauguration protesters for crimes including riot and destruction of property. And without a doubt there were some crimes committed by some protesters, including assault and destruction of property. But the prosecutors' investigation has taken an alarming turn. They've been focusing on a web site called disruptj20.org, which they allege was used to coordinate illegal behavior. Here's how the site described its goal:

We’re planning a series of massive direct actions that will shut down the Inauguration ceremonies and any related celebrations–the Inaugural parade, the Inaugural balls, you name it. We’re also planning to paralyze the city itself, using blockades and marches to stop traffic and even public transit. And hey, because we like fun, we’re even going to throw some parties.

The site also contains a large about of information about protest and discussions of anti-Trump advocacy.

The Department of Justice initially used subpoenas to DreamHost to seek subscriber information about who ran the site. That's fairly straightforward. But then they doubled down. They obtained a search warrant for an extremely broad array of data related to the site, including all stored records of access to the site or communications with the site. As written, it seems to demand data including the IP addresses of everyone who ever accessed the site and the content of every site visitor's question or comment submitted through the site's comment form, as well as all emails sent to or through the web site. The Department of Justice has filed a motion in the DC court where charges are pending to compel DreamHost to respond, and DreamHost has filed an opposition articulating its objections to the warrant.

DreamHost's brief illuminates the key issues: the search warrant is dangerously overbroad, and implicates protected speech. The Department of Justice isn't just seeking communications by the defendants in its case. It's seeking the records of every single contact with the site — the IP address and other details of every American opposed enough to Trump to visit the site and explore political activism. It seeks the communications with and through the site of everyone who visited and commented, whether or not that communication is part of a crime or just political expression about the President of the United States. The government has made no effort whatsoever to limit the warrant to actual evidence of any particular crime. If you visited the site, if you left a message, they want to know who and where you are — whether or not you did anything but watch TV on inauguration day. This is chilling, particularly when it comes from an administration that has expressed so much overt hostility to protesters, so relentlessly conflated all protesters with those who break the law, and so deliberately framed America as being at war with the administration's domestic enemies.

There's a hearing on the Department of Justice's motion on Friday. I'll keep an eye on the case. You should too, and please spread the word that this is what the government is trying to do.

Edited to add: Please feel free to disregard all my analysis, because someone linked here on Reddit and an engineer says I'm not a lawyer or anything and she can tell that the law is wrong because of the law she knows.

Copyright 2017 by the named Popehat author.
Read the whole story
acdha
5 days ago
reply
Washington, DC
Share this story
Delete
1 public comment
tingham
5 days ago
reply
No.
Cary, NC

Eclipse Searches

4 Comments and 10 Shares
There were traffic jams for the eclipses in 1970 and 1979, and that was *before* we had the potential for overnight viral social media frenzies.
Read the whole story
Share this story
Delete
3 public comments
Cthulhux
5 days ago
reply
Damn those eclipse releases.
Fledermausland
satadru
5 days ago
reply
Shit.
New York, NY
kazriko
5 days ago
I'm going to be taking a somewhat alternate path to getting into the eclipse path, I don't want to get anywhere near one of the main roads to Casper.
alt_text_bot
5 days ago
reply
There were traffic jams for the eclipses in 1970 and 1979, and that was *before* we had the potential for overnight viral social media frenzies.

try

1 Share

Read the whole story
Share this story
Delete

wrong

1 Share

Read the whole story
Share this story
Delete

Wifi vs Cellular

13 Comments and 20 Shares
According to the cable company reps who keep calling me, it's because I haven't upgraded to the XTREME GIGABAND PANAMAX FLAVOR-BLASTED PRO PACKAGE WITH HBO, which is only $5 more per month for the first 6 months and five billion dollars per month after that.
Read the whole story
Share this story
Delete
11 public comments
CaffieneKitty
27 days ago
reply
Unless you live in an apartment building from the 70's, which due to an excess of stucco and rebar are nigh-perfect Faraday cages. (I don't mind not having a cell signal in my apartment so much, but when I get delivery I have to walk with them out to the freaking parking lot to get their 'debit at the door' machine to work. :-P)
emdot
30 days ago
reply
Same, but at work not at home. (Ironic: since we're on a network backbone.)
San Luis Obispo, CA
Belfong
28 days ago
Same to me. My work internet sucks. Probably because they throttle.
mrobold
30 days ago
reply
#same
Orange County, California
endlessmike
31 days ago
reply
This is definitely not the case in my house. My internet connection is very stable and I have a good enough router that I don't have issues. Meanwhile my cellular data connection is much slower due to it being a popular provider here.
zippy72
31 days ago
reply
Weirdly this was already true in the UK for 3G and then reversed for 4G. Now I'm in Portugal it's pretty much evens.
FourSquare, qv
satadru
31 days ago
reply
For me it is connections to wifi outside the house which turn out to be shitty, but yes.
New York, NY
dianaschnuth
32 days ago
reply
Yes. This.
Toledo OH
schnuth
31 days ago
Yep. :)
llucax
32 days ago
reply
Pretty much it, except that cellular data still have a cap, which really sucks.
Berlin
Ironica
31 days ago
Technically we have a cap too (well, it throttles after we reach it, rather than cutting off or charging more) but no one in our family has been able to use more than 60% of it in a month. And unused data rolls over, to a cap of 2x the monthly allotment. So I would have to use more than 30 GB in one month to get throttled, and I don't see that happening anytime soon, even though I almost never turn on wifi. (And I almost never turn on wifi because... see above comic!)
JayM
32 days ago
reply
Ha
Atlanta, GA
alt_text_bot
32 days ago
reply
According to the cable company reps who keep calling me, it's because I haven't upgraded to the XTREME GIGABAND PANAMAX FLAVOR-BLASTED PRO PACKAGE WITH HBO, which is only $5 more per month for the first 6 months and five billion dollars per month after that.
olliejones
32 days ago
It's actually called "bufferbloat." It's a real thing. It's due to too much RAM (yeah, too much RAM) in your router.
francisga
32 days ago
reply
Read it for the alt text
Lafayette, LA, USA

shave

1 Share

Read the whole story
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories